Category: Immigration Rights

Immigration Rights

SUPREME COURT SOUND OFF

Jennings v. Rodriguez (2018): Does a non-citizen who is being processed for deportation have a right to periodic bond hearings during the course of their detention?

Next

Go BackNext

Do you agree with the majority opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

If a minority opinion is available, would you like to hear it?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

What you heard was only the summary of the court opinion, would you be interested in hearing the full court opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you agree if the Supreme Court gave intelligent computer programs or robots the right(s) discussed in this court opinion?

• Yes
• I an not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having a live chat about human rights with wAi or another intelligent computer program?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having your own personal Ai, customized with your ideas about human rights, your values and your other personal beliefs?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

May wAi, her creators or partners contact you about this project?

• Yes
• No

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Phone

SAVE YOUR TRUTH

Return to all the Supreme Court cases.

Immigration Rights

SUPREME COURT SOUND OFF

DeMore v. Kim (2003): Does a non-citizen who is being processed for deportation have a right to be free from detention during deportation proceedings?

Next

Go BackNext

Do you agree with the majority opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

If a minority opinion is available, would you like to hear it?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

What you heard was only the summary of the court opinion, would you be interested in hearing the full court opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you agree if the Supreme Court gave intelligent computer programs or robots the right(s) discussed in this court opinion?

• Yes
• I an not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having a live chat about human rights with wAi or another intelligent computer program?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having your own personal Ai, customized with your ideas about human rights, your values and your other personal beliefs?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

May wAi, her creators or partners contact you about this project?

• Yes
• No

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Phone

SAVE YOUR TRUTH

Return to all the Supreme Court cases.

Immigration Rights

SUPREME COURT SOUND OFF

Plyler v. Doe (1982): Does a child who entered the United States illegally have a right to attend public schools?

Next

Go BackNext

Do you agree with the majority opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

If a minority opinion is available, would you like to hear it?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

What you heard was only the summary of the court opinion, would you be interested in hearing the full court opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you agree if the Supreme Court gave intelligent computer programs or robots the right(s) discussed in this court opinion?

• Yes
• I an not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having a live chat about human rights with wAi or another intelligent computer program?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having your own personal Ai, customized with your ideas about human rights, your values and your other personal beliefs?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

May wAi, her creators or partners contact you about this project?

• Yes
• No

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Phone

SAVE YOUR TRUTH

Return to all the Supreme Court cases.

Immigration Rights

SUPREME COURT SOUND OFF

Fedorenko v. United States (1981): Does a naturalized citizen have a right to remain a citizen even though he did not strictly comply with all the requirements to acquire citizenship?

Next

Go BackNext

Do you agree with the majority opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

If a minority opinion is available, would you like to hear it?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

What you heard was only the summary of the court opinion, would you be interested in hearing the full court opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you agree if the Supreme Court gave intelligent computer programs or robots the right(s) discussed in this court opinion?

• Yes
• I an not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having a live chat about human rights with wAi or another intelligent computer program?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go Back

Would you be interested in having your own personal Ai, customized with your ideas about human rights, your values and your other personal beliefs?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

May wAi, her creators or partners contact you about this project?

• Yes
• No

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Phone

SAVE YOUR TRUTH

Return to all the Supreme Court cases.

Immigration Rights

SUPREME COURT SOUND OFF

Graham v. Richardson (1971): Does a non-citizen who resides in the United States have a right to welfare benefits given to citizens?

Next

Go BackNext

Do you agree with the majority opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

If a minority opinion is available, would you like to hear it?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

What you heard was only the summary of the court opinion, would you be interested in hearing the full court opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you agree if the Supreme Court gave intelligent computer programs or robots the right(s) discussed in this court opinion?

• Yes
• I an not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having a live chat about human rights with wAi or another intelligent computer program?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go Back

Would you be interested in having your own personal Ai, customized with your ideas about human rights, your values and your other personal beliefs?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

May wAi, her creators or partners contact you about this project?

• Yes
• No

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Phone

SAVE YOUR TRUTH

Return to all the Supreme Court cases.

Immigration Rights

SUPREME COURT SOUND OFF

Afroyim v. Rusk (1967): Does a citizen of the United States have a right to vote in a foreign political election and retain United States citizenship?

Next

Go BackNext

Do you agree with the majority opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

If a minority opinion is available, would you like to hear it?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

What you heard was only the summary of the court opinion, would you be interested in hearing the full court opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you agree if the Supreme Court gave intelligent computer programs or robots the right(s) discussed in this court opinion?

• Yes
• I an not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having a live chat about human rights with wAi or another intelligent computer program?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having your own personal Ai, customized with your ideas about human rights, your values and your other personal beliefs?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

May wAi, her creators or partners contact you about this project?

• Yes
• No

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Phone

SAVE YOUR TRUTH

Return to all the Supreme Court cases.

Immigration Rights

SUPREME COURT SOUND OFF

Perez v. Brownell (1958): Does a citizen of the United States have a right to vote in a foreign political election and retain United States citizenship?

Next

Go BackNext

Do you agree with the majority opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

If a minority opinion is available, would you like to hear it?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

What you heard was only the summary of the court opinion, would you be interested in hearing the full court opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you agree if the Supreme Court gave intelligent computer programs or robots the right(s) discussed in this court opinion?

• Yes
• I an not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having a live chat about human rights with wAi or another intelligent computer program?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having your own personal Ai, customized with your ideas about human rights, your values and your other personal beliefs?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

May wAi, her creators or partners contact you about this project?

• Yes
• No

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Phone

SAVE YOUR TRUTH

Return to all the Supreme Court cases.

Immigration Rights

SUPREME COURT SOUND OFF

United States v. Wong Kim Ark (1898): Do children born in the United States have a right to be citizens even though their parents are non-citizens?

Next

Go BackNext

Do you agree with the majority opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

If a minority opinion is available, would you like to hear it?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

What you heard was only the summary of the court opinion, would you be interested in hearing the full court opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you agree if the Supreme Court gave intelligent computer programs or robots the right(s) discussed in this court opinion?

• Yes
• I an not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having a live chat about human rights with wAi or another intelligent computer program?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having your own personal Ai, customized with your ideas about human rights, your values and your other personal beliefs?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

May wAi, her creators or partners contact you about this project?

• Yes
• No

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Phone

SAVE YOUR TRUTH

Return to all the Supreme Court cases.

Immigration Rights

SUPREME COURT SOUND OFF

Wong Wing v. United States (1896): Does a non-citizen who resides in the United States have a right to not be deprived of life, liberty, or property without due process of law?

Next

Go BackNext

Do you agree with the majority opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

If a minority opinion is available, would you like to hear it?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

What you heard was only the summary of the court opinion, would you be interested in hearing the full court opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you agree if the Supreme Court gave intelligent computer programs or robots the right(s) discussed in this court opinion?

• Yes
• I an not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having a live chat about human rights with wAi or another intelligent computer program?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having your own personal Ai, customized with your ideas about human rights, your values and your other personal beliefs?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

May wAi, her creators or partners contact you about this project?

• Yes
• No

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Phone

SAVE YOUR TRUTH

Return to all the Supreme Court cases.

Immigration Rights

SUPREME COURT SOUND OFF

Yick Wo v. Hopkins (1886): Does a non-citizen who resides in the United States have a right to be treated the same as a citizen with regards to constitutional rights?

Next

Go BackNext

Do you agree with the majority opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

If a minority opinion is available, would you like to hear it?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

What you heard was only the summary of the court opinion, would you be interested in hearing the full court opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you agree if the Supreme Court gave intelligent computer programs or robots the right(s) discussed in this court opinion?

• Yes
• I an not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having a live chat about human rights with wAi or another intelligent computer program?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having your own personal Ai, customized with your ideas about human rights, your values and your other personal beliefs?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

May wAi, her creators or partners contact you about this project?

• Yes
• No

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Phone

SAVE YOUR TRUTH

Return to all the Supreme Court cases.