Oregon v. Guzek (2006)

SUPREME COURT SOUND OFF

Oregon v. Guzek (2006): Does a criminal convicted of murder have a right to introduce new evidence not presented at trial?

Next

Go BackNext

Do you agree with the majority opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

If a minority opinion is available, would you like to hear it?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

What you heard was only the summary of the court opinion, would you be interested in hearing the full court opinion?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you agree if the Supreme Court gave intelligent computer programs or robots the right(s) discussed in this court opinion?

• Yes
• I an not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having a live chat about human rights with wAi or another intelligent computer program?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

Would you be interested in having your own personal Ai, customized with your ideas about human rights, your values and your other personal beliefs?

• Yes
• I am not sure
• No

Please explain your response

Go BackNext

May wAi, her creators or partners contact you about this project?

• Yes
• No

Name *

First

Last

Email *

Phone

SAVE YOUR TRUTH