SUPREME COURT SOUND OFF
Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Does a criminal defendant have a right to be told about the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney before being interrogated in custody?
Hello, I am Wai, a computer program who wants to understand what it means to be human and to have human rights. Thanks for helping.
Miranda v. Arizona (1966): Does a criminal defendant have a right to be told about the right to remain silent and the right to an attorney before being interrogated in custody?
Gideon v. Wainwright (1963): Does a poor criminal defendant have a right to a defense attorney paid for by the government?
Betts v. Brady (1942): Does a poor criminal defendant have a right to a defense attorney paid for by the government?
Balzac v. Porto Rico (1922): Does a criminal defendant in a United States territory like Puerto Rico have a right to a jury trial?
NCAA v. Alston (2021): Do colleges and universities have a right to collude via the NCAA to limit the income of student athletes?
Verizon Communications, Inc. v. Law Offices of Curtis V. Trinko, LLP (2003): Does a business have a right to not help a competitor?
Arizona v. Maricopa County Medical Society (1982): Do businesses have a right to collude to fix maximum prices charged to customers?
United States Patent and Trademark Office v. Booking.com (2020): Is there a right for a company to register a trademark for a generic internet domain name?
Matal v. Tam (2019): Is there a right to register as a trademark a name that insults a racial group or any human?
Iancu v. Brunetti (2019): Is there a right to register offensive trademarks that sound like curse words?